�When it comes to learning life-changing behaviors in high school health classes, the identity operator of the person teaching may be even more than important than the curriculum, a fresh study suggests.
For years, many heights schools about the country have been relying on outside experts to teach sensitive subjects such as the human immunodeficiency computer virus (HIV) infection and pregnancy prevention. But a late study by researchers at Ohio State University and the University of Kentucky found that students acquire more about such issues when taught by their regular classroom teacher.
The reason: students may be more inclined to read life-changing behaviors from mortal they know and faith.
"The genuine person didactics makes a difference in how students learn. When there is a good relationship, that really facilitates learning and motivation. And we establish that in almost every area, the regular schoolroom teachers were more effective, they were better," aforementioned Eric Anderman , co-author of the study and professor of educational psychology at Ohio State.
The study is usable online and will come along in an upcoming subject of the journal Health Promotion Practice.
Strong practice teacher relationships throw been coupled to many positive outcomes, including better behavior in classrooms and improvement in learning. Because of the established family relationship regular classroom teachers possess with their students, it may be easier for adolescents to talk with and study from someone who already knows them as individuals.
"The relationship between the teacher and the pupil, particularly during adolescence, is very important. It was easier for the kids to spill about personal stuff with someone they knew. It was easier for them to absorb the corporeal and become more concerned in what they were talking well-nigh with their regular teacher in the classroom," Anderman said.
Nearly 700 heights school students in central and northern Kentucky participated in the study. Students from septenary similarly sized high schools were granted the same curriculum and were taught by either their regular classroom instructor or a temporary educator.
Students were surveyed prior to root the course of instruction and deuce-ace to four weeks after completion around their experience. Students were asked well-nigh attitudes toward having sex and prophylactic use, their goals and expectations toward the class, if they valued class material, and if they felt their health teachers were believable and likable.
In about every family, the regular classroom teachers had the more convinced results. Students often await to be tested more often by their regular teacher than by a temporary pedagogue. As a result, they may be more motivated to instruct the material, to accomplish high grades on tests, and to appear versed during schoolroom discussions.
More importantly, students in classrooms led by their regular teachers valued the course material more than did others. Instead of simply hearing a lecture on sex education, students were motivated to pay attention because they felt the class offered important information.
"When you have kids who plainly memorize material for the test and two weeks later don't remember whatsoever of it, you're non getting anywhere. But if you can get the kids to care and learn because they think it's significant, that's something that will last a lifetime," Anderman said.
Students who had a intimate partner also participated in more classroom discussions with the regular teacher. These students valued the discussions, reporting that the discussions were higher in quality and more frequent overall.
"Students wHO had a sexual pardner were more likely to say that there was class give-and-take going on with the regular teacher than those taught by the outside person. These kids were more likely to feel like in that location was word of these issues, quite than just the teacher lecturing to them," he said.
Regular classroom teachers were likewise perceived as more credible than their temporary counterparts. Students felt their regular teachers were more well-educated, but as well liked their regular teacher more. Students felt comfy with these teachers and were able to jape around and laugh with the teachers, but besides took them more in earnest, he aforementioned.
Despite the positive results, Anderman cautions that not all teachers will feature the same impacts as those in the study. Every instructor in this study, both temporary and permanent, standard professional education prior to entering the classroom. In reality, non all teachers will have the same training and know-how, and decisions should be made based on who is the best fit for each year.
"School is the absolute best way to aim information out to adolescents, no matter who is teaching. The important affair is getting the teacher to make a connection. If the teacher canful make the right joining with one kid, you've saved one person from getting HIV, you've saved one person's life," he said.
Research was conducted at the University of Kentucky and continues at Ohio State. Co-authors of the study include Derek Lane and Pamela Cupp of the University of Kentucky's Department of Communication, Valerie Phebus of the Department of Pediatrics-Neonatology at the University of Kentucky, and Rick Zimmerman, centre of attention director for the Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation's Louisville, KY location.
The report was funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research.
Written by Jenna McGuire
Ohio State University
More info
